<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bonus Cuts Attract Attention</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.insidethecbc.com/bonus-cuts-attract-attention/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/bonus-cuts-attract-attention/</link>
	<description>The official blog of the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:12:26 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jolene</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/bonus-cuts-attract-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-21911</link>
		<dc:creator>Jolene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/?p=2909#comment-21911</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s keep it in context. A million dollars keeps a full northern station up and running. If you cut out all bonuses that would be 4 to 5 stations! More considering each small station is being cut in half. I&#039;d like to see management explain next year&#039;s bonuses when all the programming is nothing but repeats. I don&#039;t even know why management is even being offered a bonus because they certainly failed when it came to the budget! What&#039;s the purpose of a salary when you get big bonus for work the people being cut are doing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s keep it in context. A million dollars keeps a full northern station up and running. If you cut out all bonuses that would be 4 to 5 stations! More considering each small station is being cut in half. I&#8217;d like to see management explain next year&#8217;s bonuses when all the programming is nothing but repeats. I don&#8217;t even know why management is even being offered a bonus because they certainly failed when it came to the budget! What&#8217;s the purpose of a salary when you get big bonus for work the people being cut are doing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/bonus-cuts-attract-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-19322</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 20:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/?p=2909#comment-19322</guid>
		<description>Bonuses?  The CBC is going down the tubes are the people in charge are getting bonuses?  My god...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bonuses?  The CBC is going down the tubes are the people in charge are getting bonuses?  My god&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glad no lock out until 2014</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/bonus-cuts-attract-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-18700</link>
		<dc:creator>Glad no lock out until 2014</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/?p=2909#comment-18700</guid>
		<description>A couple of views on the state of television from the Star and Globe &amp; Mail  on Monday March, 23, 2009.
Is there a Radio Canada version of insidethecbc.com?


Debate on CBC is English-only, so far.
Chantal Hebert. The Star
http://www.thestar.com/News/Canada/article/606564


Focus, people: Saving local TV is the top priority.
John Doyle. The Globe and Mail
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20090323.ADOYLE23/TPStory/Entertainment/columnists</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of views on the state of television from the Star and Globe &amp; Mail  on Monday March, 23, 2009.<br />
Is there a Radio Canada version of insidethecbc.com?</p>
<p>Debate on CBC is English-only, so far.<br />
Chantal Hebert. The Star<br />
<a href="http://www.thestar.com/News/Canada/article/606564" rel="nofollow">http://www.thestar.com/News/Canada/article/606564</a></p>
<p>Focus, people: Saving local TV is the top priority.<br />
John Doyle. The Globe and Mail<br />
<a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20090323.ADOYLE23/TPStory/Entertainment/columnists" rel="nofollow">http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20090323.ADOYLE23/TPStory/Entertainment/columnists</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Elliott</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/bonus-cuts-attract-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-18303</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Elliott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 17:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/?p=2909#comment-18303</guid>
		<description>Wow, a Canadian AIG.

Bryan, in my company, who will remain nameless, I know exactly what you are talking about.

The money we are making barely pays our mortgages and feeds us.

It&#039;s really absurd AND WRONG that execs get bonuses off our backs, when we are doing all we can do to meet #&#039;s, jump through hoops etc.

Good luck AND hopefully someone will REVERSE that decision an cancel the bonuses</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, a Canadian AIG.</p>
<p>Bryan, in my company, who will remain nameless, I know exactly what you are talking about.</p>
<p>The money we are making barely pays our mortgages and feeds us.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s really absurd AND WRONG that execs get bonuses off our backs, when we are doing all we can do to meet #&#8217;s, jump through hoops etc.</p>
<p>Good luck AND hopefully someone will REVERSE that decision an cancel the bonuses</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/bonus-cuts-attract-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-18278</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 09:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/?p=2909#comment-18278</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m supposed to care about a 20% executive paycut when I&#039;m facing layoffs and may make 100% less?  CBC sees fit to pay me less than $42K/year, I never get my breaks and I&#039;m almost always forced to work through my lunch, yet we seem to have money to reward executes (80 of them!) who have lead us to a $200 million short fall.  Now that&#039;s leadership!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m supposed to care about a 20% executive paycut when I&#8217;m facing layoffs and may make 100% less?  CBC sees fit to pay me less than $42K/year, I never get my breaks and I&#8217;m almost always forced to work through my lunch, yet we seem to have money to reward executes (80 of them!) who have lead us to a $200 million short fall.  Now that&#8217;s leadership!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Mansbridge asks, whither the CBC? &#124; Newslab.ca</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/bonus-cuts-attract-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-18258</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Mansbridge asks, whither the CBC? &#124; Newslab.ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 02:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/?p=2909#comment-18258</guid>
		<description>[...] debate circled around the CBC financial woes and the role of our national public broadcaster. There was talk of partisan politics, francophone [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] debate circled around the CBC financial woes and the role of our national public broadcaster. There was talk of partisan politics, francophone [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Val</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/bonus-cuts-attract-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-18250</link>
		<dc:creator>Val</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 00:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/?p=2909#comment-18250</guid>
		<description>I find it completely and utterly unbelieveable that CBC is still going through with the bonuses for executices. 50 % cut be damned. In these financially troubling times when most people are worried how they can stay afloat financially it is so unbelieveable that CBC has the nerve to continue this practice when they have financial problems  already ???..... Gentlemen and I use that loosely , you should be  ASHAMED !!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it completely and utterly unbelieveable that CBC is still going through with the bonuses for executices. 50 % cut be damned. In these financially troubling times when most people are worried how they can stay afloat financially it is so unbelieveable that CBC has the nerve to continue this practice when they have financial problems  already ???&#8230;.. Gentlemen and I use that loosely , you should be  ASHAMED !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LeCanardRéincarné</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/bonus-cuts-attract-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-18243</link>
		<dc:creator>LeCanardRéincarné</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 21:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/?p=2909#comment-18243</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the likelyhood that they will follow what the BBC did for cutting back mainly in London, i.e. the &quot;head&quot;quarter? Hehe.

I am also wondering why don&#039;t they streamline the redundant CBC/RadioCan management structure while cleaning up the &quot;suit people&quot; in Montreal and Toronto. Two birds one stone!

I find the wall in between the two network most disheartening and am not surprised one bit that we are so dysfunctional as a country culturally and linguistically. For instance, I can&#039;t even submit similar comments on the French side. Malade qu&#039;on dit dans la langue de Molière. Pas imaginaire...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the likelyhood that they will follow what the BBC did for cutting back mainly in London, i.e. the &#8220;head&#8221;quarter? Hehe.</p>
<p>I am also wondering why don&#8217;t they streamline the redundant CBC/RadioCan management structure while cleaning up the &#8220;suit people&#8221; in Montreal and Toronto. Two birds one stone!</p>
<p>I find the wall in between the two network most disheartening and am not surprised one bit that we are so dysfunctional as a country culturally and linguistically. For instance, I can&#8217;t even submit similar comments on the French side. Malade qu&#8217;on dit dans la langue de Molière. Pas imaginaire&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/bonus-cuts-attract-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-18239</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/?p=2909#comment-18239</guid>
		<description>I just can&#039;t believe all this bonus crap that is hitting the media these days. We have AIG, Nortel and CBC. Bonuses should not be given out when the compnay is in financial trouble. It&#039;s just that simple. Why do others not get this? You hear these companies say that if they don&#039;t pay these bonuses they will lose executives. Now really folks, what executive in his right mind is going to leave voluntarily in this economic enviroment? If they choose to make themselves redundant in this enviroment then you should be happy. They are nutbars and have clearly illustrated this by giving up a good job to join thousands of unemployed people looking for good jobs. They have done you a favour.

Please kill these bonuses. This is not the time for bonuses. Poeople get bonuses to celebrate a companies success not failure.

Side note on CitiGroup. Don&#039;t take TARP money then spend $10 million on renovating your CEO&#039;s office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just can&#8217;t believe all this bonus crap that is hitting the media these days. We have AIG, Nortel and CBC. Bonuses should not be given out when the compnay is in financial trouble. It&#8217;s just that simple. Why do others not get this? You hear these companies say that if they don&#8217;t pay these bonuses they will lose executives. Now really folks, what executive in his right mind is going to leave voluntarily in this economic enviroment? If they choose to make themselves redundant in this enviroment then you should be happy. They are nutbars and have clearly illustrated this by giving up a good job to join thousands of unemployed people looking for good jobs. They have done you a favour.</p>
<p>Please kill these bonuses. This is not the time for bonuses. Poeople get bonuses to celebrate a companies success not failure.</p>
<p>Side note on CitiGroup. Don&#8217;t take TARP money then spend $10 million on renovating your CEO&#8217;s office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Megan</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/bonus-cuts-attract-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-18237</link>
		<dc:creator>Megan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/?p=2909#comment-18237</guid>
		<description>I would argue that the smallest stations are the most important ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would argue that the smallest stations are the most important ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Zelcer</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/bonus-cuts-attract-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-18229</link>
		<dc:creator>David Zelcer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 17:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/?p=2909#comment-18229</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe this is happening again. I&#039;ve already been laid off twice! I only have a few years to go before I can retire. I think the chances of my small station being closed completely are pretty good. To complicate things my wife also works at the same station! It&#039;s so tough waiting and wondering. I&#039;ve been with the corpse off and on since 1973. It&#039;s a shame the gutting continues. I&#039;m not sure what to make of cutting senior management bonuses by  50 percent. They probably thought it was a good move. Shows how out of touch they are. On the other hand cutting the bonuses completely could lose you some good managers. (I guess.) Watch the smallest locations take the biggest hits as the corpse shrinks into the major centres in each region. It&#039;s much easier to give a layoff notice to someone you don&#039;t see everyday. Those champions of the smaller stations are few and far between these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe this is happening again. I&#8217;ve already been laid off twice! I only have a few years to go before I can retire. I think the chances of my small station being closed completely are pretty good. To complicate things my wife also works at the same station! It&#8217;s so tough waiting and wondering. I&#8217;ve been with the corpse off and on since 1973. It&#8217;s a shame the gutting continues. I&#8217;m not sure what to make of cutting senior management bonuses by  50 percent. They probably thought it was a good move. Shows how out of touch they are. On the other hand cutting the bonuses completely could lose you some good managers. (I guess.) Watch the smallest locations take the biggest hits as the corpse shrinks into the major centres in each region. It&#8217;s much easier to give a layoff notice to someone you don&#8217;t see everyday. Those champions of the smaller stations are few and far between these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. Felonius Monk</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/bonus-cuts-attract-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-18222</link>
		<dc:creator>A. Felonius Monk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 16:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/?p=2909#comment-18222</guid>
		<description>Well, I guess that&#039; one way to look at it. &quot;why save a penny when you need a dollar&quot;, 

A bit like AIG &quot;is too big to fail&quot;

2 mil is also 40 jobs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I guess that&#8217; one way to look at it. &#8220;why save a penny when you need a dollar&#8221;, </p>
<p>A bit like AIG &#8220;is too big to fail&#8221;</p>
<p>2 mil is also 40 jobs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glad no lock out until 2014</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/bonus-cuts-attract-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-18216</link>
		<dc:creator>Glad no lock out until 2014</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 13:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/?p=2909#comment-18216</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s all about the optics. The brunt of cuts at the CBC have fallen on the reporters, camerapeople, producers, editors, PA&#039;s, EA&#039;s, newsroom staff. radio board operators etc. The talented folks actually making the the programs we watch. CBC management have traditionally wiggled out of major lay offs with minimal impact on their numbers.

If the CBC will have radical cut backs it&#039;s time to look at the bloated corporate structure and the bureaucrats that occupy a larger than necessary part of the CBC.

Eliminate the bonuses and  all together and let them keep the meager 1.5% increase we&#039;re all getting.

How about full disclosure on who makes more than 100K in base salary?

As I  posted in an earlier thread for every 100 staff positions eliminated one of the top 20 will needed to be let go also. This way they may think a little harder on where they make their cuts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s all about the optics. The brunt of cuts at the CBC have fallen on the reporters, camerapeople, producers, editors, PA&#8217;s, EA&#8217;s, newsroom staff. radio board operators etc. The talented folks actually making the the programs we watch. CBC management have traditionally wiggled out of major lay offs with minimal impact on their numbers.</p>
<p>If the CBC will have radical cut backs it&#8217;s time to look at the bloated corporate structure and the bureaucrats that occupy a larger than necessary part of the CBC.</p>
<p>Eliminate the bonuses and  all together and let them keep the meager 1.5% increase we&#8217;re all getting.</p>
<p>How about full disclosure on who makes more than 100K in base salary?</p>
<p>As I  posted in an earlier thread for every 100 staff positions eliminated one of the top 20 will needed to be let go also. This way they may think a little harder on where they make their cuts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
