The Tyee, B.C.’s left-leaning online newspaper, has published a column critical of CBC’s Facebook experiment. A snippet:
For the CBC’s part, they defend the contest with just this on the contest’s ongoing blog. “Just so you know — here at the CBC, we’ve received some complaints about the fact that we’ve continued to let this project continue, because “the wish list has been highjacked by anti-abortion lobby groups.” Our response? There’s no such thing as ‘highjacking’ with this project. Who ever can best organize their wish, and get the most people to support it… will come out on top. I guess the whole point is to BE good at lobbying for your wish.”
So “The Great Canadian Wish List” is in fact “Canada’s Next Top Lobbyist”? Okay, fine. So if I put “I wish for a return to slavery” up, and I get 3,000 bigots to join Facebook (or 1,000 bigots with three accounts each, for that matter), then that should be Canada’s greatest wish?
Give me a break. Popular doesn’t always mean right — which is why we elect politicians to debate issues and don’t just hold popular votes every week. And for that matter, popular on Facebook doesn’t even really mean popular.
I dunno. I mean, come on, how are we supposed to learn about new technologies and social networks if we don’t experiment? The Facebook project might have its problems (I personally am more upset there isn’t an equivelent Canadian platform we could have used, than the actual results) but at least we’re poking around and learning.
And that’s a far cry from the previous spirit of “Uh, we don’t understand it, so let’s not do anything about it and keep on keepin’ on like we always have.”
Points for effort, at least?
|
|
7 Comments » | Email This Post |
| Media Coverage | Posted at 2:57 pm (21 Jun 2007) |
The Globe and Mail this morning reports:
Last summer’s dust-up over Prairie Giant: The Tommy Douglas Story, in which CBC Television withdrew the $7.9-million drama under pressure from the descendants of the NDP leader’s old political foes, has reached a sunny resolution for the miniseries’ embattled writers and producers.
At the Cannes MIPTV broadcast marketplace on the French Riviera earlier this spring, Giant’s producer, Kevin De Walt of Mind’s Eye Entertainment, revealed that a deal had been struck with Hallmark International to air the two-part drama on Hallmark specialty channels in 156 territories, from Scandinavia to the Middle East.
The deal means that Prairie Giant can be screened again, something that looked unlikely after CBC cancelled a scheduled rebroadcast and suspended sales of Prairie Giant DVDs, citing uneasiness over the way it had been dramatized.
In 2005, when CBC invested $1.2-million in the biographical drama, and the Saskatchewan NDP government put in $600,000, the Opposition Saskatchewan Party complained that the project was politically partisan. The Opposition renewed the attack after Giant was broadcast in March, 2006, and seen by more than 800,000 viewers, in part because Tommy Douglas’s old adversary, Liberal premier Jimmy Gardiner, was depicted as a reactionary xenophobe with a drink in his hand.
|
|
4 Comments » | Email This Post |
| Media Coverage, Specials | Posted at 4:12 am (21 Jun 2007) |


After years of so-called high-impact miniseries that largely left viewers cold, CBC Television has unveiled a slate of fall shows that it says reflects a new belief that audiences like to be given time to really get to know TV characters.
After an amazing 2.1 million viewers tuned in for
For the record, according to the 
American newsmagazine Time Magazine has covered CBC’s trials and tribulations, reporting that the Mothercorp was “leaderless and groggy from cumulative misfortune.” Among the items the magazine notes:
Canadians, and by extension the CBC, are being accused of hitting below the belt in the fight for the
Glaswegians see the broadcast as a dig at Canada’s chief rival, and are crying foul. According to the
An interview with CBC CEO Robert Rabinovitch was published today in 
















