On Thursday the CMG released more details of the new collective agreement. “In short it has been agreed this deal is merely the starting point… Improving the ongoing relationship between the parties is the key element in this deal,” the Guild email said.
One of the major points of the deal is a 1.5 per cent salary increase effective January 1, 2009 - which means if you make $50,000 a year at you’ll be looking at a $750 dollar raise on January 1st, 2009. The 1.5 per cent rate is set by the federal Treasury Board and affects all public service unions.
“The proposed salary increases are a reflection of the current financial crisis and the limits in funding for wage increases for the public service set by Treasury Board. Other public service Unions are seeing rollbacks, we fortunately are not,” Marc-Philippe Laurin, the CMG branch president, who helped negotiate the deal said this week. “If the [Treasury Board] rate goes up in year three, four and five, we get the difference,” he added.
The deal is contingent a late January ratification vote by CMG members.
Other highlights of the deal include:
- An increase of the co-parenting provisions to 80% from 75%;
- Three weeks severance for every year of service compared to two weeks in the last collective agreement;
- Allows employees to buy additional vacation time;
- Increased access and choice for training;
- A review of compensation for IT and maintenance staff, and a review of sales targets and commissions for sales staff;
- An acknowledgement that the bureaucratic and painful PMSD process doesn’t really work.
Overall the deal reflects CBC President Hubert Lacroix’s direction. One of the major elements of the deal - improving the relationship between employees and management - is one of Lacroix’s major objectives. “This is the first time in my CBC career that bargaining has involved real dialogue from beginning to end,” Laurin said.
In some ways it’s amazing that the we’ve gone from being locked-out to a reaching new collective agreement based on trust and improved relationships in the span of four years. “Many things changed in this round of bargaining, but mainly the perception each had of the other as the enemy,” Laurin said.
The deal is also considered a living document - it’s more of guide than the final word. And it’s not set in stone. Some of the provisions can be changed, with mutual agreement, during the course of the agreement.
The full details of the deal are available here.
So what do you think of the deal? Is it good, bad, does it depend too much good relationships, or this a better way forward than picket signs and walking shoes?