<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>InsideTheCBC.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.insidethecbc.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com</link>
	<description>The official blog of the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 14:14:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>CBC Gears Up to Fight Satellite Co&#8217;s Blocking Out Local News and Hockey</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/cbc-gears-up-to-fight-for-more-access-to-local-news-and-hockey/</link>
		<comments>http://www.insidethecbc.com/cbc-gears-up-to-fight-for-more-access-to-local-news-and-hockey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 05:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Mcgrath</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CBC Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Centres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBC Edmonton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBC Satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBC Satellite Signal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBC Signal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBC TV Bell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBC TV Shaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlottetown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edmonton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fredericton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saint John]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windsor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/?p=4843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you live in any one of a number of medium-sized cities across the country, like say Edmonton, Windsor, or Fredericton, and you happen to be a Bell or Shaw satellite subscriber, you&#8217;re likely getting stiffed. And there are thousands of people just like you. That&#8217;s the message coming from the CBC over the last [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you live in any one of a number of medium-sized cities across the country, like say Edmonton, Windsor, or Fredericton, and you happen to be a Bell or Shaw satellite subscriber, you&#8217;re likely getting stiffed. </p>
<p>And there are thousands of people just like you. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s the message coming from the CBC over the last few days as the corporation ramps up an effort to lobby the CRTC to force satellite companies carry more local signals into local markets. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s an odd situation, but under current CRTC regulations satellite providers can decide that they&#8217;ll only carry one signal from a broadcaster for each time zone. </p>
<p>Which means that if you happen to live in Edmonton, and you have Bell feeding your dish, you will only get the local Calgary CBC feed. Because that&#8217;s all Bell currently carries. </p>
<p>Now if you&#8217;re a big fan of the Oilers, sitting down on Saturday nights and having to endure another Calgary game is probably enough to make you want to lose your nuggets. The same situation happens in Charlottetown, Windsor and Regina. </p>
<p>But that&#8217;s not all. </p>
<p>What about news? Most of these markets have local news teams dedicated to covering local stories. For instance, Edmonton is about go into an election. There&#8217;s a bunch of big, local news stories that demand coverage, which local viewers can&#8217;t get from their dish CBC TV channel. </p>
<p>&#8220;To me, it&#8217;s an important point for democracy,&#8221; Judy Piercey, the regional managing director of English radio and TV in Edmonton said. &#8220;There are lot of important issues coming up as the city grows,&#8221; she said, &#8220;when we get into our election coverage&#8230; people who don&#8217;t get us, won&#8217;t get it.&#8221; </p>
<p>Piercey said that although there were alternatives to CBC News, both on TV and online, she said loyal CBC viewers are constantly frustrated with being denied the local CBC signal. </p>
<p>She said when she sent a note to her staff on the issue, &#8220;people in the office were cheering, because everyone out there has answered the phone from viewers who were complaining.&#8221;</p>
<p>Silencing the local signals also hampers the CBC&#8217;s efforts to strengthen it&#8217;s local news coverage, which is a key plank of the CBC&#8217;s renewed mandate to serve local markets that was announced last year. </p>
<p>Since then, CBC has been redoubling its efforts to provide local news coverage, but again, if you are a satellite subscriber with a carrier that doesn&#8217;t carry the signal and you live in Edmonton, Fredericton, Saint John, Charlottetown, Windsor or Regina, or almost all of the towns and smaller cities in Quebec outside of Montreal, you won&#8217;t get a single frame of it. </p>
<p>In Alberta Bell only carries the Calgary feed. In Quebec Shaw only carries the Montreal feed &#8211; for the entire province. </p>
<p>Piercey said in a note to staff &#8220;that satellite TV subscribers account for around one-third of viewers across Canada, the current CRTC regulations have left many CBC stations out in the cold across the country.&#8221; She added that on Sept 8th the CBC will file a brief with the CRTC to complain about the issue. For more on that go <a href="http://cbc.radio-canada.ca/distributionissues/index.shtml">here</a>. </p>
<p>Sorry Oilers fans, but this one&#8217;s not the CBC&#8217;s fault. If you really want to fix the situation, I suggest you head over to the <a href="http://support.crtc.gc.ca/rapidscin/default.aspx?lang=en" target="blank">CRTC web site</a> and leave a comment with them. To do that find the gray button labeled &#8220;2010-488&#8243; on this <a href="http://support.crtc.gc.ca/rapidscin/default.aspx?lang=en" target="blank">page</a> and write your comment. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.insidethecbc.com/cbc-gears-up-to-fight-for-more-access-to-local-news-and-hockey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hello There Mr. Gemini. Been a While. So What&#8217;s Up?</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/hello-there-mr-gemini-been-a-while-so-whats-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.insidethecbc.com/hello-there-mr-gemini-been-a-while-so-whats-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 03:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Mcgrath</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBC Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gemini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gemini Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The National]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/?p=4833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All day today, as I sat in my cubicle at the mothership, I overheard people congratulating their colleagues. If you work in TV in Canada, or even know people who do, you know what that means. The Gemini nominations have been announced. The ceeb picked up a ton of nominations this year, 151 in total, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All day today, as I sat in my cubicle at the mothership, I overheard people congratulating their colleagues. </p>
<p>If you work in TV in Canada, or even know people who do, you know what that means. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.geminiawards.ca/">The Gemini nominations</a> have been announced. </p>
<p>The ceeb picked up a ton of nominations this year, 151 in total, topping last year&#8217;s count of 142 nominations. </p>
<p>Surprisingly, given the public reaction to the new format, The National was amongst the top nominated shows with a total of nine nods, the rest of the list includes a number of perennial fan favourites and a couple of docs and mini-series. They are:<br />
The Summit (9);<br />
Guns (9);<br />
Love, Hate and Propaganda (8);<br />
the fifth estate (7);<br />
Keep Your Head Up, Kid (7);<br />
Being Erica (6);<br />
The Tudors (6);<br />
Republic of Doyle (5).</p>
<p>CTV show led the pack in terms of total nominations for individual shows. Their Olympic coverage picked up 13 nods, while the cop drama Flashpoint, garnered 15 nominations. Flashpoint will face off against a couple CBC shows in the best drama category, rookie nominee Republic of Doyle and veteran The Tudors. </p>
<p>The corporate website also said the &#8220;CBC swept five categories—guaranteeing wins in best local newscast, small market; best host or interviewer in a news info program or series; best news anchor; best performance by an actress in a featured supporting role in a dramatic program or mini-series; and best news information series.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Vote For Your All-Time Favourite Canadian TV Show</strong><br />
If you&#8217;re feeling left out from this year&#8217;s crop of nominations, this year you can still participate in picking your all-time favourite TV show. Starting on September 15, nerdy couch potatoes will be able to vote from a list of 25 shortlisted programs for their all-time favourite pick. You will be able to vote <a href="http://www.favetvshow.ca">on this site</a>, or on Twitter and Facebook. </p>
<p>Why do I have the feeling that the Beachcombers are going to win this? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.insidethecbc.com/hello-there-mr-gemini-been-a-while-so-whats-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The New cbc.ca. Now With Overlay Ads</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/the-new-cbc-ca-now-with-overlay-ads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.insidethecbc.com/the-new-cbc-ca-now-with-overlay-ads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 03:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Mcgrath</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CBC.ca web site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbc overlay ad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbc.ca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbc.ca overlay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overlay ad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overly ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rogers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rogers overly cbc.ca]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/?p=4834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve never seen this kind of overlay advertising on cbc.ca before. It&#8217;s obviously something new. As you can see in the picture the ads appear at the bottom of the page. Anybody know anything about this new feature?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.insidethecbc.com/uploads/20100831_ad.jpg"><img src="http://www.insidethecbc.com/uploads/20100831_ad.jpg" alt="" title="20100831_ad" width="475" height="323" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4835" /></a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never seen this kind of overlay advertising on cbc.ca before. It&#8217;s obviously something new. As you can see in the picture the ads appear at the bottom of the page. </p>
<p>Anybody know anything about this new feature?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.insidethecbc.com/the-new-cbc-ca-now-with-overlay-ads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tom Harrington Moves to Marketplace</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/tom-harrington-moves-to-marketplace/</link>
		<comments>http://www.insidethecbc.com/tom-harrington-moves-to-marketplace/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 02:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Mcgrath</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personalities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[As It Happens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBC Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Bernstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketplace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Harrington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Harrington CBC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/?p=4820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tom Harrington, a four-time Gemini nominee, and an all around class act, is moving to Marketplace. In the news department Harrington has made career out of covering the issues behind the latest sports scores. Jennifer McGuire, the general manager of CBC News said the department is looking forward to the &#8220;rigour&#8221; Harrington would bring to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom Harrington, a four-time Gemini nominee, and an all around class act, is moving to Marketplace.</p>
<p>In the news department Harrington has made career out of covering the issues behind the latest sports scores.</p>
<p>Jennifer McGuire, the general manager of CBC News said the department is looking forward to the &#8220;rigour&#8221; Harrington would bring to the show.</p>
<p>Rigour. That&#8217;s a good word to describe his work.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s won a bunch of awards, but to me what stands out is a brief conversation I had with him in the elevator a couple years ago.</p>
<p>It was when the Leafs were in total disarray; on the cusp of setting a record for most consecutive games lost. On the sports channels it was a huge story, covered around the clock. </p>
<p>I asked Tom what he thought about it.</p>
<p>He said to me, &#8216;I could care less.&#8221;</p>
<p>Leaving aside the fact that he used <a href="http://www.worldwidewords.org/qa/qa-ico1.htm">an expression</a> that&#8217;s always been a thorn in my side, I thought about what he meant after the elevator doors closed.</p>
<p>What he meant was that he wasn&#8217;t interested in covering the daily hum and grind of the sports industry. What he cared about, and cares about, is the journalism, which isn&#8217;t scores and stats, it&#8217;s stories. Yes, Harrington loves sports, and he loves sports journalism, but if he had to pick one, I&#8217;d bet it would be journalism. </p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve heard him guest hosting the Current or As it Happens or seen any of his numerous pieces on The National, you&#8217;ll know what I mean. </p>
<p>He said as much a last year, in a response to Howard Bernstein (a former CBC news exec), <a href="http://hlbtoo.wordpress.com/2009/10/13/dropping-the-ball/">who was making the argument</a> that today &#8220;sports journalism on television is an oxymoron.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is what Tom wrote in response:</p>
<blockquote><p>Hi Howard:<br />
I must say I found it a bit depressing reading your piece lamenting the lack of broadcast sports journalism in this country. So I just wanted to weigh in on my own behalf because I doubt anyone else will.</p>
<p>For more than 20 years on both CBC Radio and CBC Television, I’ve taken great pride in a body of work that includes 7 seasons as host and lead correspondent of the Gemini-Award winning SPORTS JOURNAL, 5 years as the first ever sports correspondent for THE NATIONAL not to mention the journalistic chops and versatility to host AS IT HAPPENS, THE CURRENT, CROSS COUNTRY CHECK-UP, CBC NEWS SUNDAY and a variety of other important CBC News programs.</p>
<p>I’ve been nominated for 4 Gemini’s, almost all of them for my journalism, had a documentary on the 2nd ever episode of CBC’s Radio’s INSIDE TRACK in 1985…met students who say they want to emulate what I do after watching my career..in fact I might be the only reporter to ever host THE CURRENT and lead THE NATIONAL with a sports story on the same day!!</p>
<p>It’s a solitary line of work because so few in the industry want to do this sort of thing, so few in the sports media seem to value it, and notoriety (as your article shows) is so rare.</p>
<p>Still my record stands and I think what I’ve done matters.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well said, and best of luck with the journalism Tom. The sports world will miss it. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.insidethecbc.com/tom-harrington-moves-to-marketplace/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hockey Night in Canada&#8217;s NHL Schedule</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/hockey-night-in-canadas-nhl-schedule/</link>
		<comments>http://www.insidethecbc.com/hockey-night-in-canadas-nhl-schedule/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 02:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Mcgrath</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Night in Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 HNIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010-2011 hockey TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBC NHL 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HNIC 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hockey Night]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hockey Night TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL TV 2010]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/?p=4815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s almost fall, and our national obsession returns. The NHL announced the schedule for the HNIC broadcasts today. All in all the CBC gets 87 regular and pre-season games, including 29 all-Canadian matchups. The TSN channels have 124 games. But the CBC gets dibs on a real classic, the Heritage Classic in fact, which hasn&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://toomanymenonthesite.com/2010/08/05/heritage-classic-good-idea-or-bad-idea/"><img class="aligncenter" title="Heritage Classic" src="http://www.posters.ws/images/421237/jose_theodore_2003_heritage_classic_photofile.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="322" /></a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s almost fall, and our national obsession returns.</p>
<p>The NHL announced the schedule for the HNIC broadcasts today.</p>
<p>All in all the CBC gets 87 regular and pre-season games, including 29 all-Canadian matchups.</p>
<p>The TSN channels have 124 games.</p>
<p>But the CBC gets dibs on a real classic, the Heritage Classic in fact, which hasn&#8217;t been played in Canada since 2003 when the Habs faced the Oilers in a freezing rink in Edmonton.</p>
<p>This year the action is in Calgary, and again features the Habs. It should be amazing.</p>
<p>Otherwise the ceeb is ponying up 13 hours of coverage for the 11th Hockey Day in Canada extravaganza including a NHL tripleheader featuring all six Canadian-based teams.</p>
<p>Hockey Night in Canada, now in it&#8217;s 58th regular season is considered by wikipedia to be the &#8220;world&#8217;s oldest sports-related television program still on the air.&#8221; So there.</p>
<p>The entire broadcast schedule is after the jump.</p>
<p><span id="more-4815"></span></p>
<h4>CBC’S HOCKEY NIGHT IN CANADA</h4>
<p><strong>2010/11 BROADCAST SCHEDULE</strong></p>
<h4>SCHEDULE SUBJECT TO CHANGE / DISTRIBUTION TBD /</h4>
<h4>ADDITIONAL BROADCASTS MAY BE ADDED<em> </em></h4>
<p>Saturday, September 25          10 p.m. ET      <strong><em>Pre-season:</em></strong> Anaheim at Vancouver</p>
<p>Saturday, October 2                7 p.m. ET        <strong><em>Pre-Season:</em></strong> Detroit at Toronto</p>
<p>Thursday, October 7               6:30 p.m. ET   <strong><em>NHL Face-Off</em></strong></p>
<p>7 p.m. ET        Montreal at Toronto</p>
<p>10 p.m. ET      Calgary at Edmonton</p>
<p>Saturday, October 9                6:30 p.m. ET   <strong><em>Scotiabank Hockey Tonight</em></strong></p>
<p>7 p.m. ET        Ottawa at Toronto</p>
<p>7 p.m. ET        Montreal at Pittsburgh</p>
<p>10 p.m. ET      Los Angeles at Vancouver</p>
<p>Saturday, October 16              6:30 p.m. ET   <strong><em>Scotiabank Hockey Tonight</em></strong></p>
<p>7 p.m. ET        Ottawa at Montreal</p>
<p>10 p.m. ET      Edmonton at Calgary</p>
<p>Saturday, October 23              6:30 p.m. ET   <strong><em>Scotiabank Hockey Tonight</em></strong></p>
<p>7 p.m. ET        Toronto at Philadelphia</p>
<p>7 p.m. ET        Montreal at Ottawa</p>
<p>10 p.m. ET      San Jose at Edmonton</p>
<p>Saturday, October 30              6:30 p.m. ET   <strong><em>Scotiabank Hockey Tonight</em></strong></p>
<p>7 p.m. ET        NY Rangers at Toronto</p>
<p>7 p.m. ET        Boston at Ottawa</p>
<p>7 p.m. ET        Florida at Montreal</p>
<p>10 p.m. ET      Washington at Calgary</p>
<p>Saturday, November 6            6:30 p.m. ET   <strong><em>Scotiabank Hockey Tonight</em></strong></p>
<h6><strong><em> </em></strong>7 p.m. ET        <strong><em>2010 Hall of Fame Game:</em></strong> Buffalo at Toronto</h6>
<p>7 p.m. ET        Ottawa at Montreal</p>
<p>10 p.m. ET      Detroit at Vancouver</p>
<p>Saturday, November 13          6:30 p.m. ET   <strong><em>Scotiabank Hockey Tonight</em></strong></p>
<p>7 p.m. ET        Vancouver at Toronto</p>
<p>7 p.m. ET        Ottawa at Boston</p>
<p>7 p.m. ET        Carolina at Montreal</p>
<p>10 p.m. ET      Calgary at San Jose</p>
<p>Saturday, November 20          6:30 p.m. ET   <strong><em>Scotiabank Hockey Tonight</em></strong></p>
<p>7 p.m. ET        Toronto at Montreal</p>
<p>10 p.m. ET      Chicago at Vancouver</p>
<p>Saturday, November 27          6:30 p.m. ET   <strong><em>Scotiabank Hockey Tonight</em></strong></p>
<p>7 p.m. ET        Toronto at Ottawa</p>
<p>7 p.m. ET        Buffalo at Montreal</p>
<p>10 p.m. ET      San Jose at Edmonton</p>
<p>Saturday, December 4                        2 p.m. ET        San Jose at Montreal</p>
<p>6:30 p.m. ET   <strong><em>Scotiabank Hockey Tonight</em></strong></p>
<p>7 p.m. ET        Boston at Toronto</p>
<p>7 p.m. ET        Buffalo at Ottawa</p>
<p>10 p.m. ET      St. Louis at Edmonton</p>
<p>Friday, December 10              7 p.m. ET        Montreal at Detroit</p>
<p>Saturday, December 11          6:30 p.m. ET   <strong><em>Scotiabank Hockey Tonight</em></strong></p>
<p>7 p.m. ET        Montreal at Toronto</p>
<p>10 p.m. ET      Tampa Bay at Vancouver</p>
<p>Thursday, December 16          7 p.m. ET        Boston at Montreal</p>
<p>Saturday, December 18          6:30 p.m. ET   <strong><em>Scotiabank Hockey Tonight</em></strong></p>
<p>7 p.m. ET        Toronto at Vancouver</p>
<p>10 p.m. ET      Minnesota at Calgary</p>
<p>Saturday, January 1                12:30 p.m. ET <strong><em>Scotiabank Hockey Tonight</em></strong></p>
<p>1 p.m. ET        <strong><em>NHL Winter Classic:</em></strong> Washington at Pittsburgh</p>
<p>6:30 p.m. ET   <strong><em>Scotiabank Hockey Tonight</em></strong></p>
<p>7 p.m. ET        Toronto at Ottawa</p>
<p>10 p.m. ET      Calgary at Edmonton</p>
<p>Saturday, January 8                6:30 p.m. ET   <strong><em>Scotiabank Hockey Tonight</em></strong></p>
<p>7 p.m. ET        Boston at Montreal</p>
<p>7 p.m. ET        Tampa Bay at Ottawa</p>
<p>10 p.m. ET      Detroit at Vancouver</p>
<p><strong><em> </em></strong></p>
<p>Saturday, January 15              6:30 p.m. ET   <strong><em>Scotiabank Hockey Tonight</em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em> </em></strong>7 p.m. ET        Calgary at Toronto</p>
<p>7 p.m. ET        NY Rangers at Montreal</p>
<p>10 p.m. ET      Edmonton at Los Angeles<strong><em> </em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em> </em></strong></p>
<p>Saturday, January 22               6:30 p.m. ET  <strong><em>Scotiabank Hockey Tonight</em></strong></p>
<p>7 p.m. ET        Washington at Toronto</p>
<p>7 p.m. ET        Anaheim at Montreal</p>
<p>10 p.m. ET      Calgary at Vancouver</p>
<p>Saturday, January 29              6:30 p.m. ET   <strong><em>Scotiabank Hockey Tonight</em></strong></p>
<p>7 p.m. ET        <strong><em>NHL All-Star Super Skills</em></strong></p>
<p>Sunday, January 30                 6 p.m. ET        <strong><em>58<sup>th</sup> NHL All-Star Game</em></strong></p>
<p>Saturday, February 5              2 p.m. ET        NY Rangers at Montreal</p>
<p>6:30 p.m. ET   <strong><em>Scotiabank Hockey Tonight</em></strong></p>
<p>7 p.m. ET        Toronto at Buffalo</p>
<p>7 p.m. ET        Edmonton at Columbus</p>
<p>7 p.m. ET        Ottawa at NY Islanders</p>
<p>10 p.m. ET      Los Angeles at Calgary</p>
<p>Sunday, February 6                 3 p.m. ET        New Jersey at Montreal</p>
<p>Saturday, February 12                        12 p.m. ET      <strong><em>Scotiabank Hockey Day in Canada</em></strong></p>
<p>2 p.m. ET        Ottawa at Edmonton</p>
<p>5 p.m. ET        <strong><em>Scotiabank Hockey Day in Canada</em></strong></p>
<p>6:30 p.m. ET   <strong><em>Scotiabank Hockey Tonight</em></strong></p>
<p>7 p.m. ET        Toronto at Montreal</p>
<p>10 p.m. ET      Calgary at Vancouver</p>
<p>Thursday, February 17            9 p.m. ET        Montreal at Edmonton</p>
<p>Saturday, February 19                        6:30 p.m. ET   <strong><em>Scotiabank Hockey Tonight</em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em> </em></strong>7 p.m. ET        Ottawa at Toronto</p>
<p>10 p.m. ET      Dallas at Vancouver</p>
<p>Sunday, February 20               5 p.m. ET        <strong><em>Heritage Classic Pre-Game</em></strong></p>
<p>6 p.m. ET        <strong><em>NHL Heritage Classic:</em></strong> Montreal at Calgary</p>
<p>Saturday, February 26                        6:30 p.m. ET   <strong><em>Scotiabank Hockey Tonight</em></strong></p>
<p>7 p.m. ET        Pittsburgh at Toronto</p>
<p>7 p.m. ET        Philadelphia at Ottawa</p>
<p>7 p.m. ET        Carolina at Montreal</p>
<p>10 p.m. ET      Boston at Vancouver</p>
<p>Saturday, March 5                  6:30 p.m. ET  <strong><em>Scotiabank Hockey Tonight</em></strong></p>
<p>7 p.m. ET        Chicago at Toronto</p>
<p>7 p.m. ET        Montreal at Tampa Bay</p>
<p>10 p.m. ET      Edmonton at Colorado</p>
<p>Saturday, March 12                2 p.m. ET        Montreal at Pittsburgh</p>
<p>6:30 p.m. ET   <strong><em>Scotiabank Hockey Tonight</em></strong></p>
<p>7 p.m. ET        Buffalo at Toronto</p>
<p>10 p.m. ET      Vancouver at Calgary</p>
<p>Saturday, March 19                6:30 p.m. ET   <strong><em>Scotiabank Hockey Tonight</em></strong></p>
<p>7 p.m. ET        Boston at Toronto</p>
<p>7 p.m. ET        Tampa Bay at Ottawa</p>
<p>10 p.m. ET      Colorado at Edmonton</p>
<p>Sunday, March 20                   6 p.m. ET        Montreal at Minnesota</p>
<p>Saturday, March 26                6:30 p.m. ET   <strong><em>Scotiabank Hockey Tonight</em></strong></p>
<p>7 p.m. ET        Toronto at Detroit</p>
<p>7 p.m. ET        Washington at Montreal</p>
<p>10 p.m. ET      Calgary at Edmonton</p>
<p>Saturday, April 2                    6:30 p.m. ET   <strong><em>Scotiabank Hockey Tonight</em></strong></p>
<p>7 p.m. ET        Toronto at Ottawa</p>
<p>7 p.m. ET        Montreal at New Jersey</p>
<p>10 p.m. ET      Edmonton at Vancouver</p>
<p>Thursday, April 7                    7 p.m. ET        Montreal at Ottawa</p>
<p>Saturday, April 9                    1 p.m. ET        Ottawa at Boston</p>
<p>6:30 p.m. ET   <strong><em>Scotiabank Hockey Tonight</em></strong></p>
<p>7 p.m. ET        Montreal at Toronto</p>
<p>10 p.m. ET      Vancouver at Calgary</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.insidethecbc.com/hockey-night-in-canadas-nhl-schedule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alan Neal is the New Host of All in a Day</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/alan-neal-is-the-new-host-of-all-in-a-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.insidethecbc.com/alan-neal-is-the-new-host-of-all-in-a-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 01:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Mcgrath</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CBC Radio 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ottawa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Neal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All in a Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allan Neal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBC All in a day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBC drive show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBC Ottawa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBC Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBC Radio Ottawa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/?p=4810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alan Neal will replace Adrian Harewood as the host of CBC Ottawa&#8217;s afternoon drive show All in a Day. Harewood left the show to join the local TV evening newscast. Neal will be a familiar voice to listeners. He formerly hosted Bandwidth and Ontario Today. He has been a &#8216;guest&#8217; host on All in a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.insidethecbc.com/uploads/20100824_neal.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4811" title="20100824_neal" src="http://www.insidethecbc.com/uploads/20100824_neal.jpg" alt="" width="496" height="320" /></a></p>
<p>Alan Neal will replace Adrian Harewood as the host of CBC Ottawa&#8217;s afternoon drive show <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/allinaday/" target="_blank">All in a Day</a>.</p>
<p>Harewood left the show to join the local TV evening newscast.</p>
<p>Neal will be a familiar voice to listeners. He formerly hosted Bandwidth and Ontario Today. He has been a &#8216;guest&#8217; host on All in a Day for some time.</p>
<p>Neal believes in reaching out to his audience, he&#8217;s a regular at community events, and connects with listeners through his<a href="http://twitter.com/alannealottawa"> Twitter account.</a> He says using social media brings immediacy to the show. &#8221;In a world of instant communications, the program needs to reflect peoples’ desire to interact in the moment — and that’s what I try to do from the hosting chair,” says Neal.</p>
<p>Once the news was announced, an number of people on Twitter congratulated Neal. &#8220;He was the obvious choice really,&#8221; <a href="http://twitter.com/mobob" target="_blank">Bob Durie, a local listener, said</a>.</p>
<p>The show is on top-rated drive show in Ottawa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.insidethecbc.com/alan-neal-is-the-new-host-of-all-in-a-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Farewell Note From Richard Stursberg</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/farewell-note-from-richard-stursberg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.insidethecbc.com/farewell-note-from-richard-stursberg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 01:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Mcgrath</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Executives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBC Stursberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Farewell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[richard stursberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stursberg Note]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/?p=4806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A note from Richard Stursberg, the former Vice-President of CBC English Services, was posted on the employee intranet site today. Here it is in its entirety: As Duke Ellington would say: “I hope you will not be embarrassed if I tell you that I loved you all madly.” I loved your passion for the work, your [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A note from Richard Stursberg, the former Vice-President of CBC English Services, was posted on the employee intranet site today.</p>
<p>Here it is in its entirety:</p>
<blockquote><p>As Duke Ellington would say: “I hope you will not be embarrassed if I tell you that I loved you all madly.” I loved your passion for the work, your belief in success, your hope for the country and your extraordinary commitment to making something exceptional.</p>
<p>What I learned over six years is that the CBC is at its greatest when it focuses on what counts and the only thing that counts is serving Canadians. They vote every day with their viewing, their listening and their reading. When they say yes, you serve them well.</p>
<p>And you have served them well, historically well. They have never come to the CBC in greater numbers, and they come from every part of the country. They say yes to your entertainment shows, your sports, your news, your music, your talk, your documentaries and your current affairs. They say yes to celebrating Canada. They say yes when you show them how funny, clever and interesting they are.</p>
<p>You have also served our clients and partners well. Your revenues are on pace for an excellent year. Your relationships with the advertising agencies and with Apple, Rogers, Bell, the Post, and all our other great collaborators are stronger than ever.</p>
<p>I am sorry I cannot be with you the rest of the journey. It saddens me deeply not to continue. I wish you all the absolute best and even greater success in the future.</p>
<p>Richard Stursberg</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.insidethecbc.com/farewell-note-from-richard-stursberg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>58</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CW Drops 18 to Life</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/cw-drops-18-to-life/</link>
		<comments>http://www.insidethecbc.com/cw-drops-18-to-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 19:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Mcgrath</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[18 to Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBC comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US aquisitions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/?p=4802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The CBC comedy &#8217;18 to Life&#8217;, which was picked up last month by the U.S. network CW, has been dropped. The web site Digital Spy has the story: The CW has dropped sitcom 18 To Life from its schedule. The network picked up the Canadian sitcom last month and was expected to air all 12 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CBC comedy &#8217;18 to Life&#8217;, which was picked up last month by the U.S. network CW, has been dropped.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.digitalspy.com/ustv/news/a264663/the-cw-drops-18-to-life.html">web site Digital Spy has the story</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The CW has dropped sitcom 18 To Life from its schedule.</p>
<p>The network picked up the Canadian sitcom last month and was expected to air all 12 episodes of the first season.</p>
<p>However, the series debut on August 3 attracted less than a million  viewers. Ratings have continued to drop and the CW has now decided to  replace the final six episodes with repeats of family drama Life Unexpected.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.insidethecbc.com/cw-drops-18-to-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Millions of People Tune in to CBC Radio</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/millions-of-people-tune-in-to-cbc-radio/</link>
		<comments>http://www.insidethecbc.com/millions-of-people-tune-in-to-cbc-radio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 01:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Mcgrath</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CBC Radio 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBC Radio 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Changes to CBC Radio Two]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Calgary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBC audience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBC Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBC reach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edmonton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radio 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toronto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vancouver]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/?p=4797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CBC Radio 2 reaches 2.1 million people a week, while Radio One reaches 4.3 million listeners each week This according to the July audience numbers under the new audience measurement system. Numbers like these contradict claims that are sometimes made on this blog, which is usually along the lines of &#8216;no-one watches the CBC anymore.&#8217; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CBC Radio 2 reaches 2.1 million people a week, while Radio One reaches 4.3 million listeners each week</p>
<p>This according to the July audience numbers under the <a href="http://www.insidethecbc.com/new-audience-measurement-tools-may-affect-ratings/">new audience measurement system</a>.</p>
<p>Numbers like these contradict claims that are sometimes made on this blog, which is usually along the lines of &#8216;no-one watches the CBC anymore.&#8217;</p>
<p>These most recent numbers repudiate that claim.</p>
<p>Other highlights from the new book:</p>
<ul>
<li> the morning shows in Toronto and Calgary are still the most popular on the dial;</li>
<li>the morning show in Vancouver is the second most popular;</li>
<li> Edmonton captured it&#8217;s highest afternoon share all year in July;</li>
<li> Calgary&#8217;s noon and afternoon audience continued to grow.</li>
</ul>
<p>Note Nielsen&#8217;s definition of reach is: &#8220;The             cumulative percentage or total of a population that has been counted as viewers             at least once during a specified interval.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.insidethecbc.com/millions-of-people-tune-in-to-cbc-radio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Changes to Twitter Could Be Useful for Media &#8211; When it Comes to Canada.</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/changes-to-twitter-could-be-useful-for-media-when-it-comes-to-canada/</link>
		<comments>http://www.insidethecbc.com/changes-to-twitter-could-be-useful-for-media-when-it-comes-to-canada/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 12:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Mcgrath</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Secret Nerd Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBC Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fast follow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter CBC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/?p=4791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twitter announced a new feature last night, called Fast Follow, that could be useful to media companies, especially news organizations. The Fast Follow feature is a quick way to follow a Twitter account directly from a mobile phone. It essentially cuts out the computer out of the equation. The Twitter blog explains the feature, &#8220;Instead [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter announced a new feature last night, called Fast Follow, that could be useful to media companies, especially news organizations.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://media.twitter.com/859/fast-follows">Fast Follow feature</a> is a quick way to follow a Twitter account directly from a mobile phone. It essentially cuts out the computer out of the equation. <a href="http://blog.twitter.com/2010/08/introducing-fast-follow-and-other-sms.html">The Twitter blog explains the feature</a>, &#8220;Instead of directing viewers or listeners to their laptops with a URL, you can send them to their phones with Fast Follow instructions.&#8221;</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s how it works, a host would announce instructions on how to follow an account. To subscribe all viewers or listeners have to do is to send a short text: &#8221;follow [account]&#8221; to 40404 (that&#8217;s the U.S. short code, Canada&#8217;s is 21212)</p>
<p>This would subscribe the user to that Twitter account on their phone. Twitter says this is an easier, more direct subscription method because there&#8217;s no URL and no computer to boot up, and unlike computers, most people usually have their phone within reach.</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t even need a Twitter to subscribe, so it&#8217;s totally open-ended.</p>
<p>I could see this being handy for shows like <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/bestrecipes/">Best Recipes Ever</a>. I could see Kary Osmond saying &#8220;To get this recipe text &#8216;follow bestrecipesever&#8217; to 21212.&#8221; </p>
<p>That&#8217;s it.</p>
<p>The balance for broadcasters is that you don&#8217;t want to bombard the users with too many tweets. No-one wants to get a hundred tweets a day on their cell or smart phone.</p>
<p><strong>Unfortunately, this only works in the U.S. right now. Boo! </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.insidethecbc.com/changes-to-twitter-could-be-useful-for-media-when-it-comes-to-canada/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scott Pilgrim Hearts the CBC</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/scott-pilgrim-hearts-the-cbc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.insidethecbc.com/scott-pilgrim-hearts-the-cbc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Mcgrath</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBC logo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBC Shirt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Pilgrim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Pilgrim vs. the world]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/?p=4785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A screen grab from the trailer for &#8216;Scott Pilgrim vs the World.&#8217; You can watch whole trailer here. Thanks to Mark for the heads up.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.insidethecbc.com/uploads/20100816_Pilgrm.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4786" title="20100816_Pilgrm" src="http://www.insidethecbc.com/uploads/20100816_Pilgrm.jpg" alt="" width="475" height="297" /></a></p>
<p>A screen grab from the trailer for &#8216;Scott Pilgrim vs the World.&#8217;</p>
<p>You can watch whole trailer <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8NUBVcit5VM" target="blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks to Mark for the heads up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.insidethecbc.com/scott-pilgrim-hearts-the-cbc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Tea Makers Are Dead. Tea Makers Forever! Actually, no, whatever.</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/the-tea-makers-are-dead-tea-makers-forever-actually-no-whatever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.insidethecbc.com/the-tea-makers-are-dead-tea-makers-forever-actually-no-whatever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 01:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Mcgrath</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allan Sorensen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Seguin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Clark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Tea Makers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/?p=4776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s been a lot of speculation about the death of the Tea Makers, a long-running blog obsessed with the CBC, recently. If you care, I wrote a post outlining what appears to have happened. The whole post is after the jump. In case your not aware of the history, let&#8217;s start with a little background. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s been <a href="http://www.insidethecbc.com/is-the-teamakers-dead/">a lot of speculation</a> about the death of the <a href="http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:gO5uLGIohpgJ:www.theteamakers.com/2010/07/28/a-love-letter-from-george/+the+tea+makers&amp;cd=2&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;gl=ca">Tea Makers</a>, a long-running blog obsessed with the CBC, recently.</p>
<p>If you care, I wrote a post outlining what appears to have happened.</p>
<p>The whole post is after the jump.</p>
<p><span id="more-4776"></span></p>
<p>In case your not aware of the history, let&#8217;s start with a little background.</p>
<p><strong>Background</strong>: the Tea Makers was a blog that was started by an anonymous CBC employee during the 2005 lock out (as was this blog incidentally &#8211; without the anonymous part). It&#8217;s original purpose was an open letter between the guys pounding the pavement and the guys inside in the AC: don&#8217;t hate us, don&#8217;t blame us, it&#8217;s not us it&#8217;s him, we don&#8217;t like this either.</p>
<p>It was sincere. It had credibility. It was funny. It was popular.</p>
<p>At its best it was well executed Schadenfreude. Since it was anonymous, it also managed <a href="http://cbcviktim.blogspot.com/2005/10/were-still-standing-nyah-nyah-nyah.html">to break a few stories about the mood inside</a> what was then labelled &#8216;Fort Dork.&#8217;</p>
<p>Then the whole thing slowly unraveled in the years after the lockout.</p>
<p>The original author &#8216;Ouimet,&#8217; or another author, under the veil of  <a href="http://blog.fawny.org/2010/06/12/alphonseouimet-davidseguin/">&#8216;Alphonse Ouimet&#8217;</a> left, then came &#8216;Fake Ouimet,&#8217; which led to &#8216;Anonymous Ouimet&#8217; and &#8216;Allan&#8217; and &#8216;PoonGirl&#8217; and Lord knows who else.</p>
<p>And it started to get creepy. It became consumed by Jian Ghomeshi, George Stroumboulopoulos and Tod Maffin. All three were continuously mocked. As was the entire CBC, with the exception of a handful of female executives, whom they seemed to love. <a href="http://vimeo.com/14001641">Sometimes it was funny</a>. But mostly <a href="http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:zWl6swVK9l0J:www.theteamakers.com/2009/08/04/ifiweregeorge/+tea+makers+kirstine+stewart&amp;cd=7&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;gl=ca">it was disturbing. </a></p>
<p>Some quit. Others tried to delete <a href="http://blog.fawny.org/2010/06/12/alphonseouimet-davidseguin/">the legacy</a> of their involvement.</p>
<p>It stumbled along, getting more infantile and <a href="http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:Sv8shXNXdaAJ:www.theteamakers.com/2010/06/17/on-the-removal-of-controversial-posts/+Kahtryn+Borel+tea+makers&amp;cd=1&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;gl=ca">vicious</a>, until eventually it died.</p>
<p><strong>The Breaking Point</strong></p>
<p>So what killed it?</p>
<p>In the final few months the blog published a story on a Kathryn Borel, a producer at Q, who left to pursue a writing career. This was, according to  a previous blogger, Joe Clark, the final straw. &#8220;But one thing that can’t be permitted at all, even once and even for a day, is an attack on an innocent noncombatant – in this case, a hapless civilian employee of the CBC whom the Tea Makers chose to mock this week.&#8221;</p>
<p>That blog post was relatively harmless (<a href="http://www.theteamakers.com/tag/kathryn-borel/">it&#8217;s been deleted</a>), but the comments were horrible.  The whole thing was labelled as a &#8220;random character assassination&#8221; by Jesse Brown.</p>
<p>A former contributor Joe Clark said. &#8220;This pitiful victim was subjected to 75 hateful, injurious, defamatory, or simply permitted comments issued by Anonymous Cowards,&#8221; he wrote on his own <a href="http://blog.fawny.org/2010/06/12/alphonseouimet-davidseguin/">blog</a>.</p>
<p>So maybe that&#8217;s it. It&#8217;s over.</p>
<p>In it&#8217;s heyday I would have missed it. Now, well, whatever.</p>
<p>A comment on this blog about what happened is below said &#8220;For personal reasons that are nobody’s business but the originator of the blog, it was shut down in favour of lighter, more important life pursuits.&#8221;</p>
<p>The entire comment is below.</p>
<p><strong>Fake Insert Candian Name Here says:</strong><br />
Yeah, you COULD write a masters thesis on Teamakers and all the mirth mayhem, skullduggery and controversy that enshrouded it.<br />
Why not just look at it like this …<br />
1. A guy started a blog during the 2005 lockout, not knowing where it was going. He had some inside dope on the Corp ‘cos he worked there. And he loved CBC, and had good ideas and observations that made CBCers and CBC-o-philes alike have a laugh, or think a little deeper about things.<br />
2. That blogger left CBC, but kept the site alive.<br />
3. Various custodians attempted to bring new voices to the site with mixed results. One guy mistook this light-hearted site as a soap box for his oppressive take on things, mistaking satire as Journalism and trying to moralize and ‘clean up’ something that was never intended for such serous matters.<br />
4. Finally, the site became a vanity press / bathroom wall for reportage and spiteful commentary on CBC stars. Much of it was actually pro-CBC in a roundabout way. What happened though, was that many non-regulars to the site could not understand the tones of commenters and the attempts at humour, and became violently or psychotically irate.<br />
This was also responsible for drawing in the crowd I will refer to as ‘CBC Existentialsts’ – those who believe that CBC begins and ends at English terrestrial television, and who generally believe that that narrow sliver of CBC that in their minds should be shut down or privatized.<br />
5. For personal reasons that are nobody’s business but the originator of the blog, it was shut down in favour of lighter, more important life pursuits.<br />
Ironically, all the long winded META discussions about the site, the CBC and its milieu, as well as about all the free speech and moral controversy over its 5 year history have NOTHING to do with its closure.<br />
6. True Teamakers – CBCers and Non CBCers alike including Dwight, Johnny Happypants, Neutron, Kev, A-nony-nony, Patrice Nortel and many, many others will not find the Orwell quote to be cryptic, but completely a propos of the 5 year history of Ouimet’s endaevour.<br />
Good work, Ouimet. Hats off for all your efforts, even when they created unexpected results.<br />
Oh, and, GET WELL SOON, TODD! TEAMAKERS FOREVER!</p>
<p>war is peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.insidethecbc.com/the-tea-makers-are-dead-tea-makers-forever-actually-no-whatever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CBC News Boss Responds to Stursberg&#8217;s Departure: &#8220;Nothing Changes&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/cbc-news-boss-responds-to-stursbergs-departure-nothing-changes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.insidethecbc.com/cbc-news-boss-responds-to-stursbergs-departure-nothing-changes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 04:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Mcgrath</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Behind the Scenes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Executives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer McGuire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[richard stursberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stursberg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/?p=4773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This note is an internal memo from Jennifer McGuire, the General Manager and Editor in Chief of CBC News. Someone (thanks to you!) copied it into the comments on this blog. While I can&#8217;t vouch for the accuracy, I can say that usually these notes are verbatim. Without further ado: From talking to some of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This note is an internal memo from Jennifer McGuire, the General Manager and Editor in Chief of CBC News. Someone (thanks to you!) copied it into the comments on this blog. While I can&#8217;t vouch for the accuracy, I can say that usually these notes are verbatim. Without further ado:<br />
</em></p>
<p>From talking to some of you over the past few days, I know that you are wondering how the senior management changes will affect CBC News — the news renewal process, our budgets, the renewal of our journalistic policy book, and how we do our journalism and programming daily.</p>
<p>The short answer is, nothing changes.</p>
<p>It’s important to remember that we’re on a course that we set for ourselves to better serve Canadians. There is still a lot of work to do, but we are already seeing great success. We have had some hallmark moments this year. Here are just a few examples:</p>
<p>On The National, we broke powerful stories about CSIS and about the RCMP mutiny. And who could forget Bob McKeown of the fifth estate chasing down Graham James? Peter Mansbridge landed definitive interviews with newsmakers such as Helena Guergis and British Prime Minister David Cameron. On Radio, The House did an outstanding job with its Quebec special, which resonated across the country. The Charest interview was picked up by all of the major English daily newspapers and much of the French media in Quebec. These are just a couple of examples of journalism that had impact. There are many more.</p>
<p>And we are gearing up for an impressive fall. The investigative unit is delighted to welcome Diana Swain. It is pursuing several stories, and its work will be a high priority in the months ahead.</p>
<p>This will be the second season for the new local news formats and late night newscasts. It will be a great chance to build on our success in these areas. Local programs have seen strong ratings growth, and ensuring that they are able to deliver more original and enterprise journalism will solidify the gains. To support this, we have launched a local investigative initiative out of Winnipeg.</p>
<p>In the fall, we will continue the development of local radio news. We have new research that gives us insight into the radio news programs, and how Canadians use them and feel about them. As you know, local radio is an incredible strength for CBC Radio and CBC News. It is important to invest in the continued success of these newscasts. I will be sharing more details about this work soon.</p>
<p>Fall will also be critical for the renewal of our digital platforms. We plan to launch changes to breaking news online in October, and a more extensive change to CBCNews.ca in January. You can get a glimpse of some of the new territory by checking out some of the impressive work done during the G20: http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/g20/index.html</p>
<p>We continue to commit to innovation and have started a push to develop new programming initiatives. We have a series in the works on volunteering. The Marketplace team is working on a project about hospitals and healthcare that will be featured on The National. We will continue to explore new program ideas in current affairs. Make the Minister Work will get a run as a series. The fall will also see CBC News Network going more often to the stories that matter to Canadians, just as it did when Mark Kelley traveled to the Gulf of Mexico to cover the oil leak or when Heather Hiscox was in Vancouver for the Olympics.</p>
<p>In newsgathering, we are looking at how we organize breaking news coverage. The Hub will sharpen its focus on this to better serve CBC News Network, radio hourly newscasts and our digital platforms.</p>
<p>All this to say that CBC News is on track and still moving forward. I hope everyone has been enjoying summer. I look forward to a great fall.</p>
<p>Jennifer McGuire<br />
General Manager and Editor in Chief, CBC News</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.insidethecbc.com/cbc-news-boss-responds-to-stursbergs-departure-nothing-changes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Defending Stursberg&#8217;s Legacy</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/defending-stursbergs-legacy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.insidethecbc.com/defending-stursbergs-legacy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 00:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Mcgrath</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Executives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[departure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ian Morrison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason MacDonald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leaving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lise Lareau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[richard stursberg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/?p=4771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since Richard Stursberg&#8217;s departure from the CBC, a lot of people have commented on the former vice-president&#8217;s legacy at the corporation. Some have been less than kind. Lise Lareau, President of the Canadian Media Guild, called him the &#8220;Dick Cheney of the CBC.&#8221; Others celebrated his departure. Friends of Canadian Broadcasting&#8217;s Ian Morrison, said he [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since Richard Stursberg&#8217;s departure from the CBC, a lot of people have commented on the former vice-president&#8217;s legacy at the corporation. </p>
<p>Some have been <a href="http://hlbtoo.wordpress.com/2010/08/07/ding-dong-the-witch-is-dead/">less than kind</a>. </p>
<p>Lise Lareau, President of the Canadian Media Guild, <a href="http://newsshift.blogspot.com/2010/08/richard-stursberg-early-thoughts-about.html">called him</a> the &#8220;Dick Cheney of the CBC.&#8221;</p>
<p>Others celebrated his departure. Friends of Canadian Broadcasting&#8217;s Ian Morrison, said he was &#8220;hard-pressed to define Stursberg&#8217;s legacy.&#8221;</p>
<p>That comment seems to caught the attention of Jason MacDonald, Stursberg&#8217;s former CBC Chief of Staff at CBC Television. He responded to that in <a href="http://www.ottawacitizen.com/opinion/op-ed/risks+turning+audience/3387811/story.html">an op-ed in the Ottawa Citizen today. </a></p>
<blockquote><p>How about this for a legacy?: In an era when Canada&#8217;s public broadcaster receives less than half of the public financial support that public broadcasters in other OECD countries receive, Stursberg was able to turn CBC Television into the second-most-watched network in the country.</p>
<p>In prime time, (the evening viewing period from 7 p.m. to 11 p.m. when most Canadians are actually watching television) he was able to secure an audience share of 10 per cent. How significant is that? When he took over as head of CBC Television the network&#8217;s share was at an all-time low, at just over six per cent.</p></blockquote>
<p>MacDonald went on to say:</p>
<blockquote><p>Sure, the early evening schedule, from 7 p.m. to 8 p.m., featured two U.S. game shows, something the &#8220;Friends&#8221; of Canadian Broadcasting make much of, but there is method to that madness: those shows are low-cost to acquire and generate desperately needed funds for a CBC that has been forced to secure more than half of the revenue required to fulfil its mandate from commercial sources.</p></blockquote>
<p>And finally:</p>
<blockquote><p>He pushed the CBC to improve its online offering and he challenged CBC Radio to reach even more Canadians than it already does. (Today it enjoys the largest share in its history.)</p></blockquote>
<p>Hard numbers to argue with. I encourage you to read the entire article. It&#8217;s <a href="http://www.ottawacitizen.com/opinion/op-ed/risks+turning+audience/3387811/story.html">here</a>. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.insidethecbc.com/defending-stursbergs-legacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Tea Makers &#8220;Could Be Finished&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/is-the-teamakers-dead/</link>
		<comments>http://www.insidethecbc.com/is-the-teamakers-dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 19:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Mcgrath</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Tea Makers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/?p=4761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Tea Makers, a blog that is almost always critical, sometimes incisive, and usually obsessive of the CBC, may be gone. &#8220;It could be finished,&#8221; Allan Sorensen, one of the bloggers who frequently writes on the site said, adding &#8220;it&#8217;s too early to say.&#8221; Sorensen said the issue was &#8220;behind the scenes drama which makes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4762" style="border: 1px solid black;" title="20100812_glitch" src="http://www.insidethecbc.com/uploads/20100812_glitch.jpg" alt="" width="475" height="204" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.theteamakers.com/">The Tea Makers</a>, a blog that is almost always critical, sometimes incisive, and usually obsessive of the CBC, may be gone.</p>
<p>&#8220;It could be finished,&#8221; Allan Sorensen, one of the bloggers who frequently writes on the site said, adding &#8220;it&#8217;s too early to say.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sorensen said the issue was &#8220;behind the scenes drama which makes little sense.&#8221; </p>
<p>&#8220;I hope to see it return but some personal issues need to be resolved.&#8221;</p>
<p>The homepage of the site reads cryptically: &#8220;2005-2010 &#8211; He loved Big Brother.&#8221;</p>
<p>Internal disputes are not uncommon with the blog, in the past one of the guys, Fake Ouimet, or Anonymous Fake PoonGirl or somebody like that, deleted a all of their posts in some sort of fight. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.insidethecbc.com/is-the-teamakers-dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>73</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steven and Chris Make A Big Debut</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/steven-and-chris-make-a-big-debut/</link>
		<comments>http://www.insidethecbc.com/steven-and-chris-make-a-big-debut/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Mcgrath</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Steven and Chris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Program Partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rich Colbert]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/?p=4755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The CBC&#8217;s Steven and Chris are gearing up for a massive launch in the U.S. According to the TVNewsCheck site, the show is launching in a bunch of test markets in the States in September: Steven and Chris will make its U.S. debut in broadcast syndication on Sept. 13, with clearances on stations in 50 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4756" title="stevenandchris" src="http://www.insidethecbc.com/uploads/stevenandchris.jpg" alt="" width="479" height="320" /></p>
<p>The CBC&#8217;s Steven and Chris are gearing up for a massive launch in the U.S.</p>
<p>According to the <a href="http://www.tvnewscheck.com/articles/2010/08/09/daily.3/" target="_blank">TVNewsCheck site</a>, the show is launching in a bunch of test markets in the States in September:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Steven and Chris</em> will make its U.S. debut in broadcast syndication on Sept. 13, with clearances on stations in 50 markets covering about 40% of the country.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is according to Ritch Colbert, a principal at Program Partners, the company representing the show in the States.</p>
<p>The CBC in-house production is set to roll out in several U.S. markets including San Franciso, Austin and Hartford.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;It&#8217;s a phased rollout,&#8221; says Colbert. &#8220;The fact that we have 50 markets is a legitimate test to see how the show performs in a variety of competitive situations and environments.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.insidethecbc.com/steven-and-chris-make-a-big-debut/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CBC President Sets the Record Straight Following Stursberg&#8217;s Departure</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/cbc-president-sets-the-record-straight-following-stursbergs-departure/</link>
		<comments>http://www.insidethecbc.com/cbc-president-sets-the-record-straight-following-stursbergs-departure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 03:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Mcgrath</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Executives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBC executive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBC Richard Stursberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBC VP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hubert lacroix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirstine Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lacroix Stursberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[richard stursberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stursberg Departure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stursberg push]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/?p=4748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the full text of CBC President and CEO Hubert Lacroix&#8217;s note to staff this afternoon. To leave a comment on Lacroix&#8217;s note, scroll down to the bottom of this post. Hubert T. Lacroix: Setting a few things straight August 10, 2010 A mid-summer note following the events of last week is in order. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><em>This is the full text of CBC President and CEO Hubert Lacroix&#8217;s note to staff this afternoon. To leave a comment on Lacroix&#8217;s note, scroll down to the bottom of this post. </em></div>
<div><em><br />
</em></div>
<div><strong>Hubert T. Lacroix: Setting a few things straight</strong></div>
<div>
<div>August 10, 2010</div>
</div>
<div>
<p>A mid-summer note following the events of last week is in order. The news of Richard Stursberg’s departure last week will, of course, generate speculation about what happened, what it means and what it doesn’t. As usual, most of it will be just that, speculation.</p>
<p>So, let me set a few things straight.</p>
<p>I chose Kirstine Stewart to step in as Executive Vice-President English Services not because she was next in line but because she has the leadership skills and the expertise to keep English Services driving forward as hard and as fast as possible while we run our formal recruitment process (which could take up to 9 months). She is not a caretaker. She is not a babysitter. This is not about waiting or slowing down. She is in charge, has full authority and has my complete confidence.</p>
<p>We have several launches coming, a strategic plan to land and then cost, choices to make, a Leaders Forum to organize, a corporate budget to prepare… and that&#8217;s only from my vantage point! We are not slowing down. We don&#8217;t need to, we don&#8217;t have time to.</p>
<p>With the creation of a new strategic plan, this is a good time to review the leadership of CBC. The decision to change leadership was not a sudden decision triggered by any specific incident. And, by the way, we did not escort Richard out of the building (where do people get these rumours?). It was, rather, the culmination of a very long reflection on the future of the Corporation, the culture it needs to adopt in order to change and adapt in an evolving media environment and our ability to agree to a long term plan based on a shared vision.</p>
<p>In essence, the Strategic Plan is about having a clearer definition of what the public broadcaster brand stands for. Our industry is morphing. While we still rely on the conventional broadcasting model we have known , we will, increasingly, migrate to new models that have yet to become clear. Having a shared, compelling and visible set of principles that give shape to the public broadcasting brand will be a roadmap for future decisions. And the brand is about what we do and how we do it and how we communicate it.</p>
<p>However, you should immediately know that there is nothing (and I mean nothing) in our current programming strategies that I don&#8217;t stand by: so, those out there who think this is in any way a repudiation of where we stand today will be disappointed big time.</p>
<p>One constant in all this is that CBC/Radio-Canada will continue to fulfill its mandate by responding to the media and cultural challenges facing the country. Implicit in that for me are these points among others:</p>
<ul>
<li>The drama/entertainment strategy that has been a source success in television over the last few years will continue to be a central plank of our future strategy;</li>
<li>The integration and modernization of our news services both regionally and nationally remains essential to our mandate and our success;</li>
<li>Radio One’s unique role in the media landscape, whether on radio or through new media, will be maintained and nurtured;</li>
<li>Our commitment to a music strategy that serves Canada’s music lovers and musical artists will continue;</li>
<li>Our commitment to truly reflecting the regions to themselves and nationally is as important a priority as we have;</li>
<li>We will not give up our lead in new media;</li>
<li>And, by now, I hope that you know how much I care about our people.</li>
</ul>
<p>This is not an exhaustive list so if your own personal area of activity is not mentioned, please do not conclude that it is not important or not included in the strategy. The point is, we are moving forward from the strong position we hold, not going back to the past.</p>
<p>It is about building a public broadcaster for 2015 that is even more successful, more in tune with the needs and wants of Canadians and more engaged in their lives. It is also about building a public broadcaster that is home to the most ambitious and creative workforce in the country. We have the team right here, right now, to do that. I am extremely proud of you and of what you do, every day.</p>
<p>Hope you have had or will have a good break this summer. We’ll need all your energy and passion as we prepare for the fall.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.insidethecbc.com/cbc-president-sets-the-record-straight-following-stursbergs-departure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Broadcast in Analogue</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/broadcast-in-analogue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.insidethecbc.com/broadcast-in-analogue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 11:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Mcgrath</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archives/Vintage Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Exit Interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ampex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ampex 351]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadcast in Analogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reel-to-reel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Couldrey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/?p=4743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ryan Couldrey, a part-time photographer working at the CBC, is posting a series of shots of &#8220;retro, lo-fi audio gear,&#8221; on his blog. This is the first in the series. It&#8217;s an Ampex 351 reel to reel recorder. The intertubes tells me that this machine is from the 1960&#8242;s. There&#8217;s a video demonstration of one [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://ryancouldrey.com/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4744" title="20100810_couldrey" src="http://www.insidethecbc.com/uploads/20100810_couldrey.jpg" alt="" width="450" height="450" /></a></p>
<p>Ryan Couldrey, a part-time photographer working at the CBC, is posting a series of shots of &#8220;retro, lo-fi audio gear,&#8221; on his <a href="http://ryancouldrey.com/" target="_blank">blog</a>.</p>
<p>This is the first in the series. It&#8217;s an Ampex 351 reel to reel recorder. The intertubes tells me that this machine is from the 1960&#8242;s. There&#8217;s a video demonstration of one of these in action <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tCmcQeSnCNc" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>Anyone have any stories/memories of using this gear?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.insidethecbc.com/broadcast-in-analogue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Full Steam Ahead: Kirstine Stewart Responds to Stursberg&#8217;s Departure</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/full-steam-ahead-kirstine-stewart-responds-to-stursbergs-depature/</link>
		<comments>http://www.insidethecbc.com/full-steam-ahead-kirstine-stewart-responds-to-stursbergs-depature/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 15:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Mcgrath</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Behind the Scenes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Executives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[departure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dismissal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hubert lacroix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirstine Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[richard stursberg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/?p=4739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kirstine Stewart, who has taken over Richard Stursberg&#8217;s duties as vice-president on English CBC on an interim basis, sent out this note to staff this morning: It&#8217;s official, there is no such thing as a &#8216;quiet time&#8217; in our world, no matter if the summer beckons with promises of vacation and time off, the CBC [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Kirstine Stewart, who has taken over Richard Stursberg&#8217;s duties as vice-president on English CBC on an interim basis, sent out this note to staff this morning:</em></p>
<p>It&#8217;s official, there is no such  thing as a &#8216;quiet time&#8217; in our world, no matter if the summer beckons with  promises of vacation and time off, the CBC never really takes a  holiday.</p>
<p>As you know, last Friday our  President, Hubert T. LaCroix, announced a major change in leadership in English  Services with the departure of Richard Stursberg.</p>
<p>I am used to writing these notes in  times of celebration and in honour of the many achievements of our great team  here at CBC. And although this is a different occasion, I think that it is our  progress and those great markers of achievement that are important for us all to  focus upon during this period of transition.</p>
<p>The CBC is a collection of  remarkable people working in collaboration in every region of the country across  each of our centres &#8211; from the front-line staff putting shows to air, to our  managers, our leaders, and our talent. Together, we deliver the best of Canadian  programming.</p>
<p>We are all moving ahead as we do  our work for the CBC. Despite media speculation regarding the change that has  just happened, Hubert made it clear to me that he supports our programming and  is a fan of the shows that we make.</p>
<p>We do our best work when our  programming on radio, online and on television, created by the CBC and its  partners, reflects and engages Canadians. Our relationship with audiences has  been deepening as of late with more people tuning into CBC&#8217;s multiple platforms  to enjoy our great sports coverage, our in-depth first class news analysis, our  challenging documentaries and current affairs and our engaging music and  entertainment shows. Hubert has reinforced with me that he does not want that  momentum to slow down or risk being lost.</p>
<p>We have an opportunity going  forward, to build on the legacy of programming developed both in CBC&#8217;s past and  in its present, the best of both survive and thrive to combine and give  Canadians a broadcaster they can truly relate to, and one that they can  absolutely rely upon. And it&#8217;s time to seize that opportunity, to prove again  and again that Canadians want to see and hear their lives and priorities  reflected in the programming CBC gives to them.</p>
<p>As we head into our 75th year, and  with Canadian private broadcasters calling for reductions in their commitment to  Canadian content, we are alone positioned to take up that mantle. And we will  succeed by engaging and entertaining people across the country, whether they  argue out loud with Anna Maria Tremonti&#8217;s latest guests on The Current, or with  Peter Mansbridge and The National&#8217;s At Issue panel; whether they cheer on the  Leafs, Habs or Canucks, or their favourite hockey player battling to figure  skate; whether they laugh with Rick as he shows us the funny side of our  Canadian lives, get confounded by Pat and Peter on This is That, or triumph with  Erica as she battles through her own life in a way people can all relate;  whether they discover new favourite bands with Rich Terfry, or get their 24-hour  news fix from CBC News Network, and at the end of their day watch their local  news report. We are CBC and we are here to remind Canadians why they are  special. And we are here to learn from them and now more than ever we have the  chance to listen in as well as we broadcast out.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s to a less eventful rest of  your summer. I&#8217;m honoured to be in a role currently where I get to work with all  of you together as we move the CBC forward. I thank Hubert for the  opportunity, his direction and his support. And as he has said &#8211; &#8216;full steam  ahead&#8217;.</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>K</p>
<p>Kirstine  Stewart</p>
<p>Interim Executive Vice  President</p>
<p>English  Services</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.insidethecbc.com/full-steam-ahead-kirstine-stewart-responds-to-stursbergs-depature/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stursberg is Gone. So What Now?</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/stursberg-is-gone-what-now/</link>
		<comments>http://www.insidethecbc.com/stursberg-is-gone-what-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 14:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Mcgrath</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Behind the Scenes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Executives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBC executive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBC Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hubert lacroix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[richard stursberg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/?p=4664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since Richard Stursberg, former vice-president of English CBC, left last week there has been a lot of speculation about the circumstances of his exit and what it means for employees, for the CBC, and ultimately for the public. He sparked a revolution within the corporation. His departure is going to have a huge impact. It&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since Richard Stursberg, former vice-president of English CBC, left last week there has been a lot of speculation about the circumstances of his exit and what it means for employees, for the CBC, and ultimately for the public.</p>
<p>He sparked a revolution within the corporation. His departure is going to have a huge impact. It&#8217;s what everyone was talking about on Friday, and I&#8217;m sure it will continue this week.</p>
<p>So what does his departure mean?</p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t we sort through a few of digital tea leaves to find out.</p>
<p>First, let&#8217;s start at square one. What happened?</p>
<p>Was he pushed or did he jump?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nationalpost.com/todays-paper/ousts+revolutionary+after+years/3371437/story.html"> Apparently he was pushed</a>: &#8220;The decision was made by Mr. Lacroix,&#8221; CBC spokesman Bill Chambers said.</p>
<blockquote><p>On the cusp of leading the Crown corporation in drafting a new five-year strategic plan, CBC president Hubert Lacroix felt the time was right to &#8220;bring in new leadership.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Ok. So when and how did this happen? <a href="http://www.thestar.com/entertainment/television/article/845000--richard-stursberg-out-as-head-of-cbc">The Toronto Star says it happened after</a>: &#8220;a meeting in Toronto late Thursday between Stursberg and Lacroix.&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p>“There were lots of debate, but no fisticuffs, I’m afraid,” CBC vice-president of communication Bill Chambers said of the final tête-à-tête.</p></blockquote>
<p>So after a late Thursday meeting, that&#8217;s it.</p>
<p>So what does it mean?</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #800000; font-size: 1.4em;">Most Significant Development at the CBC in Years</span></strong><br />
It&#8217;s obviously a big indication of some competing visions. &#8220;I can&#8217;t think of a more significant development at the CBC in years,&#8221; Lise Lareau, President of the Canadian Media Guild, <a href="http://newsshift.blogspot.com/2010/08/richard-stursberg-early-thoughts-about.html">said on her blog on Friday</a>.</p>
<p>In order to figure what his departure means you&#8217;ve got to look at his legacy. Lareau says:</p>
<blockquote><p>Stursberg took the CBC &#8212; our public broadcaster &#8212; down a very commercial road. It was his way of dealing with tepid funding and unreliable support from the federal government. Programs were judged as successful only by ratings, not by the value they may contain for public discourse or the public record.</p></blockquote>
<p>She makes a good point there.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #800000; font-size: 1.4em;">The Tightrope</span></strong><br />
Stursberg was walking a tightrope.</p>
<p>He was getting less assurance from the government, and he had to shore up the dike.</p>
<p>His tried to replace depreciating public money with ad money. But to get ad money, you need eyeballs, and that&#8217;s what he was after, and that&#8217;s exactly what he delivered.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.torontosun.com/news/canada/2010/08/08/14962161.html">The Ottawa Sun crunched the numbers,</a> and during his time the TV ratings went up, way up, gaining 52 per cent.</p>
<p>So Stursberg saw a problem &#8211; dwindling tax dollars funding the mother corp &#8211; and he sought a solution: more ads, and more expensive ads.</p>
<p>Unfortunately for him, and for the CBC, bringing in more ads doesn&#8217;t help much when you have to defend the importance of a cultural institution in a committee room on Parliament Hill.</p>
<p>&#8220;Richard Stursburg&#8217;s departure came about because his vision for the CBC and the traditional mission of public service became increasingly irreconcilable,&#8221; Jeffrey Dvorkin, a former CBC Radio executive said on his <a href="http://nowthedetails.blogspot.com/2010/08/why-is-managing-cbc-so-damn-difficult.html">blog</a>.</p>
<p>That was, in essence, the sword that Stursberg fell on. He was a victim of his own success.</p>
<p>Does this mean the CBC is going to reverse course now that he&#8217;s gone? Are we going back to more arts programming and longer stories on The National?</p>
<p>Mr. President, over to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.insidethecbc.com/stursberg-is-gone-what-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
