<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New drama to move into &#8220;Intelligence&#8221; prime-time slot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.insidethecbc.com/hustle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/hustle/</link>
	<description>The official blog of the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 17:31:08 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Klassen</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/hustle/comment-page-1/#comment-3256</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Klassen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/shows/intelligence/hustle/#comment-3256</guid>
		<description>Intelligence is arguably among the best Canadian drama series ever produced. The fact that CBC programmers have yet to renew the series and have let its timeslot go to a Brit series (brilliant job, folks) does not surprise. As usual, the big thinkers at the Mothercorp leave me wondering whether to laugh or cry.

Come on, kids. Haddock has handed you gold, now do your part to make it pay off for viewers and your organization.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intelligence is arguably among the best Canadian drama series ever produced. The fact that CBC programmers have yet to renew the series and have let its timeslot go to a Brit series (brilliant job, folks) does not surprise. As usual, the big thinkers at the Mothercorp leave me wondering whether to laugh or cry.</p>
<p>Come on, kids. Haddock has handed you gold, now do your part to make it pay off for viewers and your organization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kranz</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/hustle/comment-page-1/#comment-3251</link>
		<dc:creator>kranz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 03:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/shows/intelligence/hustle/#comment-3251</guid>
		<description>Intelligence is definetly one of the more solid shows that are on television today. wether is be american or canadian, intelligence is def there. The problem is that most people i know have never heard of it. The p.r. is terrible and the advertising channels are not doing it justice. A show like this could  be picked up by a u.s. cable station, promote is properly and have a winning show. It is weeds meets the wire with a sopranos family aspect........my only fear is that cbc&#039;s inabilty to promote it to the level it deserves to be will ultimatly lead to its death. I hope that cbc does a second season.. This show is tops. 10 out of 10 people that i have showed teh show to recently have fallen in love with it. I didn not even know the show existed until last week....ridiculous....thang god for pvr....and one of my friends or i woud lhave never gotten to experience the show. CBC do something right, you have a winner, promote it during prime time american shows, invest, it will only lead to you guys doing well with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intelligence is definetly one of the more solid shows that are on television today. wether is be american or canadian, intelligence is def there. The problem is that most people i know have never heard of it. The p.r. is terrible and the advertising channels are not doing it justice. A show like this could  be picked up by a u.s. cable station, promote is properly and have a winning show. It is weeds meets the wire with a sopranos family aspect&#8230;&#8230;..my only fear is that cbc&#8217;s inabilty to promote it to the level it deserves to be will ultimatly lead to its death. I hope that cbc does a second season.. This show is tops. 10 out of 10 people that i have showed teh show to recently have fallen in love with it. I didn not even know the show existed until last week&#8230;.ridiculous&#8230;.thang god for pvr&#8230;.and one of my friends or i woud lhave never gotten to experience the show. CBC do something right, you have a winner, promote it during prime time american shows, invest, it will only lead to you guys doing well with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Classic</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/hustle/comment-page-1/#comment-3231</link>
		<dc:creator>Classic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/shows/intelligence/hustle/#comment-3231</guid>
		<description>_Yes, I can always be wrong.  Yet Wikipedia and a couple of other sources say CBC premiered seasons 1&amp;2 together (12 eps altogether) during the summer of &#039;06.  Heist aired Here in the spring.
_Hustle, being a UK show was shown There in the spring of &#039;04, &#039;05, and &#039;06, six episodes each.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>_Yes, I can always be wrong.  Yet Wikipedia and a couple of other sources say CBC premiered seasons 1&amp;2 together (12 eps altogether) during the summer of &#8217;06.  Heist aired Here in the spring.<br />
_Hustle, being a UK show was shown There in the spring of &#8217;04, &#8217;05, and &#8217;06, six episodes each.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen LaRose</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/hustle/comment-page-1/#comment-3220</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen LaRose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/shows/intelligence/hustle/#comment-3220</guid>
		<description>Classic: Actually, Hustle came before Heist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Classic: Actually, Hustle came before Heist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/hustle/comment-page-1/#comment-3208</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 02:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/shows/intelligence/hustle/#comment-3208</guid>
		<description>I used to watch Intelligence and Hustle on Friday nights.  (It&#039;s true I have no life.  And admittedly I pretty much only get one channel--CBC--out here in the hinterland).  

Still I hafta say Hustle is fluffy &amp; formulaic.  I&#039;d pick Intelligence any day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to watch Intelligence and Hustle on Friday nights.  (It&#8217;s true I have no life.  And admittedly I pretty much only get one channel&#8211;CBC&#8211;out here in the hinterland).  </p>
<p>Still I hafta say Hustle is fluffy &amp; formulaic.  I&#8217;d pick Intelligence any day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G. Bartlett</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/hustle/comment-page-1/#comment-3206</link>
		<dc:creator>G. Bartlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 18:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/shows/intelligence/hustle/#comment-3206</guid>
		<description>Ever since DaVinci&#039;s Inquest debuted, I&#039; ve made a point of catching every production of the Chris Haddock team.  I can&#039;t believe that Intelligence may be cancelled...or maybe I can&#039;t believe that it didn&#039;t attract a large enough audience.  Hustle  is entertaining in a flashy, fluffy kind of way, but I wouldn&#039;t rush home to see it.  One thought on Intelligence; it is a complex story and might challenge potential viewers who hadn&#039;t been with it from the start.  I want more, please!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever since DaVinci&#8217;s Inquest debuted, I&#8217; ve made a point of catching every production of the Chris Haddock team.  I can&#8217;t believe that Intelligence may be cancelled&#8230;or maybe I can&#8217;t believe that it didn&#8217;t attract a large enough audience.  Hustle  is entertaining in a flashy, fluffy kind of way, but I wouldn&#8217;t rush home to see it.  One thought on Intelligence; it is a complex story and might challenge potential viewers who hadn&#8217;t been with it from the start.  I want more, please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Classic</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/hustle/comment-page-1/#comment-3200</link>
		<dc:creator>Classic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 16:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/shows/intelligence/hustle/#comment-3200</guid>
		<description>_I, for one, automatically dismissed it as a pale British exported clone of another U.S., but already network(!) cancelled, thief show, Heist.  This was entirely owing to the sole CBC promo clip of a British/continental english sounding actress.
_That&#039;s pretty weak - that the modern CBC is tepidly airing ordinary US program(s) &quot;in prime time&quot;.  At least in past decades, it had the honesty and skill to add top level shows like Dallas into its mix.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>_I, for one, automatically dismissed it as a pale British exported clone of another U.S., but already network(!) cancelled, thief show, Heist.  This was entirely owing to the sole CBC promo clip of a British/continental english sounding actress.<br />
_That&#8217;s pretty weak &#8211; that the modern CBC is tepidly airing ordinary US program(s) &#8220;in prime time&#8221;.  At least in past decades, it had the honesty and skill to add top level shows like Dallas into its mix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Edwards</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/hustle/comment-page-1/#comment-3199</link>
		<dc:creator>David Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 15:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/shows/intelligence/hustle/#comment-3199</guid>
		<description>On television, hustle usually beats intelligence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On television, hustle usually beats intelligence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meir</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/hustle/comment-page-1/#comment-3196</link>
		<dc:creator>Meir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/shows/intelligence/hustle/#comment-3196</guid>
		<description>very cool

thx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very cool</p>
<p>thx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Friesen</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/hustle/comment-page-1/#comment-3195</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Friesen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 12:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/shows/intelligence/hustle/#comment-3195</guid>
		<description>It should be noted that Hustle is not a US series. It is made by the BBC in the UK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should be noted that Hustle is not a US series. It is made by the BBC in the UK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Rukavina</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/hustle/comment-page-1/#comment-3194</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Rukavina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 11:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/shows/intelligence/hustle/#comment-3194</guid>
		<description>Although Hustle does, indeed, play in the U.S., I believe its provenance is not actually that of a &quot;U.S. cable drama&quot; but rather a BBC production picked up by AMC in the U.S. and CBC in Canada.  

References:

- http://www.bbc.co.uk/drama/hustle/
- http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0379632/companycredits
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hustle_%28TV_series%29</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although Hustle does, indeed, play in the U.S., I believe its provenance is not actually that of a &#8220;U.S. cable drama&#8221; but rather a BBC production picked up by AMC in the U.S. and CBC in Canada.  </p>
<p>References:</p>
<p>- <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/drama/hustle/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk/drama/hustle/</a><br />
- <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0379632/companycredits" rel="nofollow">http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0379632/companycredits</a><br />
- <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hustle_%28TV_series%29" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hustle_%28TV_series%29</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/hustle/comment-page-1/#comment-3193</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 11:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/shows/intelligence/hustle/#comment-3193</guid>
		<description>What I don&#039;t understand about programming,is why are new shows that are good scheduled against good show with established audiences.  It seems like a death sentence most of the time unless the new show is marketed to death and is really that good. 

Obviously, I am not a programming exec. I just regret that I did not PVR intelligence. Well, maybe DVD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I don&#8217;t understand about programming,is why are new shows that are good scheduled against good show with established audiences.  It seems like a death sentence most of the time unless the new show is marketed to death and is really that good. </p>
<p>Obviously, I am not a programming exec. I just regret that I did not PVR intelligence. Well, maybe DVD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/hustle/comment-page-1/#comment-3191</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 06:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/shows/intelligence/hustle/#comment-3191</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t Hustle a BBC series? It&#039;s made by the people who made Spooks (a.k.a. MI-5.) What&#039;s with the focus on the U.S.?

(I enjoyed Hustle when it was on during the summer. And MI-5. And Intelligence. And Da Vinci&#039;s Inquest, which, by the way, it being re-released on DVD in a few weeks. I&#039;d pick any of those over House.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t Hustle a BBC series? It&#8217;s made by the people who made Spooks (a.k.a. MI-5.) What&#8217;s with the focus on the U.S.?</p>
<p>(I enjoyed Hustle when it was on during the summer. And MI-5. And Intelligence. And Da Vinci&#8217;s Inquest, which, by the way, it being re-released on DVD in a few weeks. I&#8217;d pick any of those over House.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

