<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Outside company to sell CBC shows internationally</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.insidethecbc.com/intlsales/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/intlsales/</link>
	<description>The official blog of the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 17:31:08 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: More</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/intlsales/comment-page-1/#comment-8367</link>
		<dc:creator>More</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 08:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/intlsales#comment-8367</guid>
		<description>The department was actually making money since the intro of several series including Heartland, The Border, etc. The problem is that Billinger doesn&#039;t want the portfolio. He handles Digital and Business Development. The department didn&#039;t have a chance under this structure because of it&#039;s misplacement within CBC. Once the Director of CBC International Sales was relieved of her duties the department was easy pickings. It had no voice. We all realise the interesting strategy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The department was actually making money since the intro of several series including Heartland, The Border, etc. The problem is that Billinger doesn&#8217;t want the portfolio. He handles Digital and Business Development. The department didn&#8217;t have a chance under this structure because of it&#8217;s misplacement within CBC. Once the Director of CBC International Sales was relieved of her duties the department was easy pickings. It had no voice. We all realise the interesting strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dwight Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/intlsales/comment-page-1/#comment-8176</link>
		<dc:creator>Dwight Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 01:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/intlsales#comment-8176</guid>
		<description>Both issues worth of attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both issues worth of attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabriel</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/intlsales/comment-page-1/#comment-8169</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 23:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/intlsales#comment-8169</guid>
		<description>For the record, I am quite concerned about copyright law changes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the record, I am quite concerned about copyright law changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kev</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/intlsales/comment-page-1/#comment-8168</link>
		<dc:creator>Kev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 21:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/intlsales#comment-8168</guid>
		<description>Media consolidation definitely affects the CBC. Copyright law changes, not so much, it&#039;s true, but if you care enough to freak out over a relatively minor (not to the people who&#039;ve been cut obviously, but to the industry in general) outsourcing decision then you should be at least aware of the changes there. 

And what form do you think this public consultation should take? If it&#039;s not a poll of the general public, what else is there that&#039;s fair and not just a way for special interest groups to unduly influence your public broadcaster? And what about the effect it would have on the responsiveness of the organisation to change? It just makes no sense at all to me, but maybe I&#039;m missing something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Media consolidation definitely affects the CBC. Copyright law changes, not so much, it&#8217;s true, but if you care enough to freak out over a relatively minor (not to the people who&#8217;ve been cut obviously, but to the industry in general) outsourcing decision then you should be at least aware of the changes there. </p>
<p>And what form do you think this public consultation should take? If it&#8217;s not a poll of the general public, what else is there that&#8217;s fair and not just a way for special interest groups to unduly influence your public broadcaster? And what about the effect it would have on the responsiveness of the organisation to change? It just makes no sense at all to me, but maybe I&#8217;m missing something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: estragon</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/intlsales/comment-page-1/#comment-8167</link>
		<dc:creator>estragon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 20:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/intlsales#comment-8167</guid>
		<description>I am shocked that the CBC is selling these programs outright rather than licensing the distribution for a limited time. They were created with public funds; they should stay in Canadian hands.  I wonder also how this deal affects residuals, royalties, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am shocked that the CBC is selling these programs outright rather than licensing the distribution for a limited time. They were created with public funds; they should stay in Canadian hands.  I wonder also how this deal affects residuals, royalties, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabriel</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/intlsales/comment-page-1/#comment-8166</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 01:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/intlsales#comment-8166</guid>
		<description>But Kevin, most of those other things that you say I should be concerned about are not CBC-related (except for the integration one, which I&#039;m not sure I&#039;m opposed to). Also public consultations &#8800; referendum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But Kevin, most of those other things that you say I should be concerned about are not CBC-related (except for the integration one, which I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;m opposed to). Also public consultations &#8800; referendum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kev</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/intlsales/comment-page-1/#comment-8164</link>
		<dc:creator>Kev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 18:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/intlsales#comment-8164</guid>
		<description>Well that just sucks. Someone must have read the first couple of chapters of A Christmas Carol and mistaken it for Secrets Of Successful Executives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well that just sucks. Someone must have read the first couple of chapters of A Christmas Carol and mistaken it for Secrets Of Successful Executives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/intlsales/comment-page-1/#comment-8156</link>
		<dc:creator>More</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 04:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/intlsales#comment-8156</guid>
		<description>Apparently all 13 staffers will be cut from CBC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently all 13 staffers will be cut from CBC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kev</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/intlsales/comment-page-1/#comment-8153</link>
		<dc:creator>Kev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 01:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/intlsales#comment-8153</guid>
		<description>You are kidding, aren&#039;t you? I&#039;m not particularly enthusiastic about this deal either, but what you&#039;re proposing is crazy. Do you want to have a referendum on every business decision in every Crown Corporation? (Coz if so, I&#039;ve been trying to get some RAM for my work box for the past 6 months - maybe we could take the purchase order to the polls in early January?)

If you want to talk about public say in the media, about really vital things where the voice of the people needs to be heard and soon, maybe you should look at the most recent private CanWest merger, which the CRTC just rubber-stamped, or the new copyright bill being proposed in January, or the planned integration of CBC TV and Radio. Whatever your stance on these issues, they will shape the media landscape for years to come, and they directly affect what the Canadian public gets to see and how they get to see it.  The outsourcing of international syndication by the CBC, while important to the people involved, and hopefully to their union reps, is nothing by comparison, nada, zip.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are kidding, aren&#8217;t you? I&#8217;m not particularly enthusiastic about this deal either, but what you&#8217;re proposing is crazy. Do you want to have a referendum on every business decision in every Crown Corporation? (Coz if so, I&#8217;ve been trying to get some RAM for my work box for the past 6 months &#8211; maybe we could take the purchase order to the polls in early January?)</p>
<p>If you want to talk about public say in the media, about really vital things where the voice of the people needs to be heard and soon, maybe you should look at the most recent private CanWest merger, which the CRTC just rubber-stamped, or the new copyright bill being proposed in January, or the planned integration of CBC TV and Radio. Whatever your stance on these issues, they will shape the media landscape for years to come, and they directly affect what the Canadian public gets to see and how they get to see it.  The outsourcing of international syndication by the CBC, while important to the people involved, and hopefully to their union reps, is nothing by comparison, nada, zip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swiv</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/intlsales/comment-page-1/#comment-8151</link>
		<dc:creator>Swiv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 22:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/intlsales#comment-8151</guid>
		<description>With Gabriel&#039;s first comment on this -- the public should be consulted on deals that are this far-reaching.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Gabriel&#8217;s first comment on this &#8212; the public should be consulted on deals that are this far-reaching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dwight Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/intlsales/comment-page-1/#comment-8148</link>
		<dc:creator>Dwight Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 20:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/intlsales#comment-8148</guid>
		<description>Good questions, both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good questions, both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabriel</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/intlsales/comment-page-1/#comment-8143</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 17:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/intlsales#comment-8143</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not opposed to contracting someone else to sell our programs internationally, but a permanent deal (as opposed to a license) will lock CBC in. What if a more profitable potential deal comes up later? How many other firms did they consider before choosing Fireworks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not opposed to contracting someone else to sell our programs internationally, but a permanent deal (as opposed to a license) will lock CBC in. What if a more profitable potential deal comes up later? How many other firms did they consider before choosing Fireworks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/intlsales/comment-page-1/#comment-8141</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/intlsales#comment-8141</guid>
		<description>Steve&#039;s another &quot;go-forward&quot; kinda guy, isn&#039;t he? Do they remove plain English when they hire these people?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve&#8217;s another &#8220;go-forward&#8221; kinda guy, isn&#8217;t he? Do they remove plain English when they hire these people?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabriel</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethecbc.com/intlsales/comment-page-1/#comment-8132</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 04:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethecbc.com/intlsales#comment-8132</guid>
		<description>Really bad idea. Where are the public consultations where I can go and oppose this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really bad idea. Where are the public consultations where I can go and oppose this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

