Comments on: Is the Iran Coverage the Future of Journalism?

By: Railton de Sousa Guedes

Railton de Sousa Guedes — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 05:53:10 +0000

by “motivated activists” is better than $$$$$$ activists.

By: Paul Mcgrath

Paul Mcgrath — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:19:10 +0000

oops. I fixed that.

By: JimJoe

JimJoe — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:11:57 +0000

Your link to the new york times goes to a real estate agent?

By: fogcutter

fogcutter — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 16:14:53 +0000

With the advent of raw, in the moment, true-life videos, it will be interesting to note the level of censorship that will be employed. I’m referring to journalistic censorship –the worse kind.

By: Bob

Bob — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:37:05 +0000

I love it when people say the future is “blurry video.”

Won’t be long before those cameras are broadcast quality.

I’m sure journos will find another thing to be frightened about.

By: Michael

Michael — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 07:56:58 +0000

Hey, have you seen this news article?
New details about Michael Jackson’s Death Emerge
I was wondering if you were going to blog about this…

By: Is the Iran Coverage the Future of Journalism?

Is the Iran Coverage the Future of Journalism? — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 23:01:36 +0000

[...] original here: Is the Iran Coverage the Future of Journalism? Comments [0]Digg [...]

By: Glad no lock out until at least 2014

Glad no lock out until at least 2014 — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 22:05:16 +0000

Sometimes a little fact checking is required when airing “user generated content”.

http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/us_world/NATL-Counter-Intelligence-0623.html